7 Best Loom Alternatives for Screen Recording in 2026

# 7 Best Loom Alternatives for Screen Recording in 2026

Loom built the async video communication category almost single-handedly. The browser extension, instant sharing link, and auto-transcription set the standard. But since Atlassian acquired Loom in 2023, the pricing and feature limitations on the free plan have tightened, and many users are actively looking for alternatives.

We tested seven serious Loom alternatives across different use cases — from quick async team updates to polished customer-facing demos. Here's what actually works.

---

Quick Comparison: Loom Alternatives

Pricing as of early 2026 — always verify current plans on vendor websites.

---

Why Leave Loom?

Loom's free plan post-acquisition has meaningful limitations:

• Videos capped at 5 minutes per recording
• 25 video storage limit
• No custom branding
• Viewer insights require paid plans

The paid Starter tier at $12.50/user/month (billed annually) solves these, but the value calculation changed after the acquisition. If you're paying $150/user/year for Loom and the features you actually need are covered by cheaper alternatives, it's worth evaluating.

---

1. Tella — Best for Polished, Cinematic Async Video

Tella is what Loom would look like if design had been the primary priority. The recording interface is genuinely beautiful — your camera feeds in a floating window with smooth background blur, the recording countdown is elegant, and the final output looks professional without post-production effort.

For async team updates, demos, and product walkthroughs, Tella produces videos that look like they required editing when they didn't. Features like speaker backgrounds, scenes (switch between screen/camera/slides mid-recording), and smooth transitions are baked into the recording flow rather than requiring separate editing.

The free plan allows 10 videos with watermarking. Pro at $19/month unlocks unlimited videos, custom branding, and viewer analytics.

The limitation: Tella doesn't have the deep integrations Loom has built over 7+ years. The notification ecosystem (Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce) is still developing. For teams whose primary workflow is internal team communication, Tella's polish outweighs the integration gap.

Best for: Founders sharing product updates, async team communication where presentation quality matters, customer-facing walkthroughs Not ideal for: Teams that need deep CRM integration or enterprise access controls Pricing: Free (10 videos, watermarked) → $19/mo (Pro)

---

2. Veed — Best When You Need to Edit Your Recordings

Veed started as an online video editor and added screen recording — the opposite of Loom, which started with recording and added editing. That heritage shows: Veed's editing capabilities are significantly more powerful than Loom's.

After recording, you can trim, add subtitles (auto-generated), overlay text, insert transitions, remove silences automatically, and add background music — all without leaving the browser. If your recordings frequently need cleanup before sharing, Veed saves meaningful time compared to recording in Loom and editing in a separate tool.

The auto-subtitle feature is genuinely accurate and fast. For accessibility and async viewers watching without sound, auto-captions in under a minute per video is a real productivity win.

The free plan adds a watermark and limits export resolution. Paid plans start at $18/month (Basic) or $30/month (Pro). For teams that already pay for a separate video editor, consolidating into Veed can net savings.

Best for: Marketing teams creating product demos or tutorials that need post-production polish; anyone who edits recordings regularly Not ideal for: Quick async updates where you want raw speed from recording to shared link; teams not needing editing Pricing: Free (watermarked, limited export) → $18/mo (Basic) → $30/mo (Pro)

---

3. Wistia — Best for Marketing and Customer-Facing Video

Wistia is a different category from Loom. It's a video hosting and marketing platform that happens to include screen recording. If your primary use case is sending demos to prospects, hosting product tutorials on your website, or using video as a marketing asset, Wistia's analytics and conversion features are unmatched.

Call-to-action overlays let you add a button to any video — "Schedule a demo," "Start free trial," or any custom CTA. Email capture forms can appear mid-video before the viewer can continue. Heatmaps show you exactly where viewers drop off, helping you optimize longer demos.

The free plan is genuinely limited: 3 hosted videos. That's enough to evaluate the platform but not to run a real workflow. The Starter plan at $19/month (10 videos) and Pro at $79/month (unlimited) are priced for professional marketing use, not personal async communication.

Best for: Sales and marketing teams hosting customer-facing demos and tutorials; teams that track video engagement for lead scoring Not ideal for: Internal async communication; teams on tight budgets; high-volume recording workflows Pricing: Free (3 videos) → $19/mo (Starter, 10 videos) → $79/mo (Pro, unlimited)

---

4. Vidyard — Best for Sales Prospecting

Vidyard has gone deep on a specific use case: sales video. The platform is purpose-built to help sales reps send personalized video messages to prospects, track who watched what, and push that engagement data to Salesforce, HubSpot, or Outreach.

The free plan is permanently available and includes unlimited video recording with a 1-hour limit per video — significantly more generous than Loom's 5-minute limit on free. You get viewer tracking (who opened, how long they watched) and a personalized video library.

For sales teams, the CRM integrations are the real value. Knowing that a prospect watched 80% of your video and clicked the CTA can trigger automated follow-up sequences in your sales platform. Loom's sales integrations exist but feel less purpose-built than Vidyard's.

The free plan serves solo users well. Team features, advanced analytics, and branded sharing require the paid tier ($19/month per user for Business).

Best for: SDRs and AEs doing video prospecting; sales teams wanting CRM-integrated video engagement data Not ideal for: Internal async communication; teams without a CRM workflow; pure screen recording without the sales context Pricing: Free (unlimited recordings, viewer tracking) → $19/user/mo (Business) → Enterprise (custom)

---

5. Clipchamp — Best Free Option for Windows Users

Clipchamp is Microsoft's video editing and screen recording tool, now bundled with Windows 11 and included in Microsoft 365 subscriptions. If your team is already paying for Microsoft 365, Clipchamp costs nothing incremental.

The screen recording feature is basic but functional: record screen, camera, or both, with a clean preview editor. The editing tools cover cutting, transitions, text overlays, and filters. Export quality is solid.

What Clipchamp lacks is the sharing infrastructure that makes Loom and its alternatives useful for async communication — no shareable link with viewer analytics, no notification integrations, no transcript generation. You export a video file and share it yourself.

For teams that need quick screen recording without a monthly subscription — particularly Windows-native users — Clipchamp is genuinely adequate. For teams that want the instant-link-and-analytics workflow, you'll want a different tool.

Best for: Windows users needing free screen recording; Microsoft 365 subscribers who need occasional recordings without adding a new subscription Not ideal for: Teams needing shareable links with analytics; async communication workflows; Mac-primary teams Pricing: Free with Windows 11 / Microsoft 365

---

6. Screenpal — Best Budget-Conscious Choice

Screenpal (formerly Screencast-O-Matic) is the most affordable paid option in this list. The free plan allows recordings up to 15 minutes — enough for detailed tutorials — though it adds a watermark. The Solo Deluxe plan at $4/month makes it the cheapest paid screen recording tool with meaningful features.

At $4/month, you get unlimited recording time, no watermark, basic captions, and the Screenpal hosting library. The tool works on Windows, Mac, and Chrome OS. The interface feels dated compared to Tella or Veed, but the core recording and sharing functions work reliably.

For educators, solo content creators, or small teams with tight budgets, Screenpal offers a functional workflow at a price that's hard to argue with.

Best for: Budget-conscious teams, educators, solo creators; teams where $4/month is the right price point Not ideal for: Teams that need polished output, CRM integrations, or team collaboration features Pricing: Free (15-min limit, watermark) → $4/mo (Solo Deluxe) → $8/user/mo (Team Premier)

---

7. Berrycast — Best for Simple Team Video Libraries

Berrycast focuses on the simplest version of team screen sharing: record a video, share it with your team, build a searchable library of video messages. No editing, no marketing overlays, no complex integrations — just a clean recording + sharing workflow for teams.

The interface is simpler than Loom, which is a feature for teams that found Loom's expanding feature set overwhelming. Setup is fast, the Chrome extension works reliably, and video organization into team collections is intuitive.

The free plan covers basic personal recording. The paid plan at $10/user/month (Teams) unlocks the shared library, organization features, and viewer analytics.

Best for: Small teams wanting a simpler, less expensive alternative to Loom with basic team sharing Not ideal for: Sales teams, marketing-focused use cases, teams needing advanced editing or integrations Pricing: Free (personal use) → $10/user/mo (Teams)

---

How to Choose the Right Loom Alternative

---

FAQ

What is the best free Loom alternative?

Vidyard offers the most generous free plan — unlimited recordings up to 1 hour each, with viewer tracking. For teams that don't need CRM integration, Screenpal's free plan (15-minute recordings) is a solid runner-up.

Is Tella better than Loom?

For recording quality and visual polish, yes. Tella produces more cinematic-looking videos with less effort. Loom has deeper integrations and a larger ecosystem. For teams prioritizing presentation quality over integration depth, Tella is worth switching to.

Does Veed work for team collaboration?

Veed has team plans that allow shared video libraries and brand kits, but it's primarily a creation tool rather than a communication platform. For team async communication, Loom, Tella, or Berrycast are more purpose-built.

What happened to Loom after the Atlassian acquisition?

Atlassian acquired Loom in October 2023. The core product has continued development with deeper Jira/Confluence integrations. The free plan became more restrictive (5-minute limit) and pricing for paid tiers increased for some users. Many teams report unaffected workflows; others have found the value calculation shifted enough to warrant evaluating alternatives.

Is there a screen recorder with AI features?

Veed has AI-powered subtitle generation. Loom has AI-generated summaries and chapters. As of early 2026, AI features in screen recording tools are most mature in Loom and Veed — other alternatives are adding AI capabilities but typically offer less than Loom's AI suite.

---

Conclusion

The best Loom alternative depends on what you actually use Loom for. If it's internal async team updates and you want more polish, Tella is the upgrade. If you need post-production editing, Veed handles it natively. For sales teams, Vidyard's free tier and CRM integrations are hard to beat.

Many teams find that a combination works well: Vidyard for sales outreach (free) and Tella for team communication (paid). At $19/month for Tella, you're paying less than Loom's paid tier while getting a more polished recording experience.

---

Related reading: [Zapier vs Make: Which Automation Tool is Better](/zapier-vs-make) | [Best Slack Alternatives for Small Teams](/slack-alternatives) | [Best Typeform Alternatives](/typeform-alternatives)